The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 134, No 1, 30-41.
© 2003 American Dental Association

Curve Dental
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHLEYER, T. K.L.
Right arrow Articles by CORBY, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SCHLEYER, T. K.L.
Right arrow Articles by CORBY, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Practice Management

INFORMATICS & TECHNOLOGY

COVER STORY

The technologically well-equipped dental office



TITUS K.L. SCHLEYER, D.M.D., Ph.D., HEIKO SPALLEK, D.M.D., Ph.D., WILLIAM C. BARTLING, D.D.S. and PATRICIA CORBY, D.M.D.


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 TECHNOLOGY’S FUNCTIONS IN...
 THE STATE-OF-THE-ART DENTAL...
 GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background. Information technology, or IT, applications for dental practice continue to develop rapidly. More than 85 percent of all dentists use computers in their offices, and the number of clinical uses for the computer is on the rise. This article discusses the state of the art of several technologies, provides an integrative view of a technologically well-equipped office and offers several guidelines for technology purchasing decisions.



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The technologically well-equipped dental office. DSL: Digital subscriber line. CPU: Central processing unit. Artwork by Titus Schleyer, Heiko Spallek and Stephan Hempel.

 
Conclusions. Most administrative applications are relatively mature and are required for the smooth functioning of today’s dental offices. Clinical applications—such as dental and medical health histories, charting, digital imaging, diagnostic and treatment applications, and decision support—vary in their degree of maturity. Most Internet applications—such as Internet-based scheduling and e-mail communication with patients—still are an optional adjunct for dental practices.

Practice Implications. Practitioners should develop a comprehensive plan for implementing or updating the IT infrastructure in their offices. Issues to be considered in technology purchasing decisions include usability, integration, work flow support, cost-benefit analysis and compliance with standards.

The pace of change with which dentists must cope daily in their practices has accelerated. In the past, attending dental school and a few select continuing education courses provided most dentists with the knowledge and the skills they needed for a successful professional career in clinical practice. Today, the rate and nature of change, the challenges of managing an increasing volume of information, and the time pressures in dental practice are major sources of stress for many practitioners.13

Practitioners should develop a comprehensive plan for implementing or updating the information technology infrastructure in their offices.

Evaluating, adopting, implementing, troubleshooting and maintaining information technology, or IT, in a dental practice certainly has contributed to the level of stress. Not only is IT a relatively new and rapidly changing part of dentistry, it also is an area about which practitioners may know little. Most practitioners received no formal instruction in computing in dental school. Consequently, they are forced to make decisions about technology based on potentially biased and incomplete information from salespeople, articles touting technology, and presentations and continuing education courses of varying quality. Once a technology has been installed in the office, its benefits and drawbacks become immediately clear through daily use. As a consequence, new acquisitions that fail to live up to their expected benefits quickly lose their luster and cause dissatisfaction among their users.

Yet, technology also can provide a solution to many of the routine hassles in dental practice. Well-integrated systems, designed around the work flow of the dental team, can allow care providers to concentrate on what they do best: delivering patient care. Such systems provide information when and where it is needed, minimize indirect and duplicative data entry, capture information at the source and are easy to use. While optimal systems are far from fully realized, technology undeniably has made some progress. In 1976, only 1 percent of dentists used computers in their offices and less than 25 percent used external commercial computing services.4 In 1986, approximately one-fourth of all respondents in a two-state survey indicated that they did not ever expect to use a computer for accounting; while one-third each said the same for administrative, clinical and educational uses.5 By 2000, in a marked turnaround, 85.1 percent of all dentists in the United States used a computer in the office, and 48.3 percent of these computers were connected to the Internet.6 Today, in-office computers with Internet access have joined the handpiece as two essential instruments for dental practice.

Figure 1Go illustrates the trends for computer ownership in dental practice, selected administrative and clinical computer uses, and Internet connectivity in the United States for the period from 1984 to 2000.610 While administrative applications (such as patient registration and accounting) always have been the primary uses for computers in dental practice, clinical uses are increasing. In addition, the dental profession has been adopting use of the Internet relatively rapidly.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Computer ownership, Internet connectivity and selected computer uses in dental practice in the United States (1984–2000). Source: American Dental Association Survey Center.610

 
This article provides a brief review of the state of the art of several dental IT applications to help practitioners develop a strategy for choosing and using appropriate technologies in their offices. We concentrate on how to support the work flow in a dental office with a well-integrated technology infrastructure rather than with the patchwork of gadgets and programs common today.

Note that the well-equipped dental office described in this article is fictitious, but that many of the illustrated products and technologies exist. At this time, they cannot be integrated into the dental office as seamlessly as we have described in this article. However, we hope that our vision will impel companies to improve the design and level of integration of their products, and will help practitioners gain a clearer understanding of what to look for when shopping for new dental technologies.


   TECHNOLOGY’S FUNCTIONS IN THE DENTAL OFFICE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 TECHNOLOGY’S FUNCTIONS IN...
 THE STATE-OF-THE-ART DENTAL...
 GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Computing applications for dental practice generally are separated into administrative and clinical categories. While most systems historically have focused on administrative functions, clinical applications are gaining importance. The Internet has opened up possibilities for functions that were unthinkable even a few years ago. For example, two-way communications between the dental office and patients, colleagues and suppliers are taking form as e-mailed appointments, case consultation and ordering.11 While we describe Internet applications separately from administrative and clinical applications in this article, the Internet will become simply another communication medium in the service of either administration or clinical practice in the future.

Tables 1Go and 2Go list common administrative and clinical technologies, respectively, and group them into "must-have," "nice-to-have" and "optional" categories. "Must-have" applications are essential to the functioning of a dental practice (such as patient registration, practice reporting and electronic claims submission, which has become more standardized as a result of the the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 199612). Applications that can add significant value, but are not required, are labeled as "nice-to-have" for reasons such as, for instance, professional development.13 "Optional" functions, for the most part, are either technologically immature or of interest to only a limited number of practices1419; some may not have been formally evaluated (decision support applications, for example20), and thus their value for clinical practice may not have been established. Our goal in classifying applications as "must-have," "nice-to-have" and "optional" was not to develop a rigid prescription for every dental practice. Rather, the recommendations should be viewed as a general guideline to be adapted individually.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE APPLICATIONS: PRIORITY RANKING OF DENTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUNCTIONS.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 CLINICAL APPLICATIONS: PRIORITY RANKING OF DENTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUNCTIONS.

 
None of the administrative functions (Table 1Go) are listed as optional, because all administrative applications are relatively technologically mature and central to the operation of a dental practice. Whether some of them are "nice to have" has more to do with practice and provider preference than with the particular technology itself. Clinical applications (Table 2Go), on the other hand, fall into all three priority categories. Some of them are relatively mature, easy to use and widely applicable, such as software for dental and medical history and treatment planning. Others—such as progress notes, charting and digital imaging—are technologies approaching relative maturity. However, more development is needed to make them truly useful and, in some cases, to bring them fully in line with standards (one example is digital imaging, which is not yet fully compliant with the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine, or DICOM, standard21). The clinical applications we have labeled "optional" are either niche systems or relatively recent developments.
Because many of the Internet-based services depend on network effects, their utility will remain limited until the Internet is used as commonly as the telephone.

We consider none of the Internet applications (Table 3Go) as "must-have," because their usefulness tends to be limited by three factors. First, large segments of the profession and the population do not (yet) use the Internet. Because many of the Internet-based services depend on network effects,22 their utility will remain limited until the Internet is used as commonly as the telephone. Second, some of the Internet applications are not fully developed. For instance, joint patient care by several colleagues (such as physicians, dentists and dental specialists) is a highly complex and interactive activity for which appropriate tools do not yet exist. Even dentists who consult with individual colleagues through the Internet are painfully aware of the effort required in organizing and sending even a limited subset of a patient’s information electronically. Third, many people believe that data that have been sent or are accessible by the Internet are inherently insecure.23 Computer systems protected with state-of-the-art security measures have a very low probability of being compromised.24,25 Despite the developmental status of Internet applications, they probably have the most potential to significantly change dentistry in the coming years.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 INTERNET APPLICATIONS: PRIORITY RANKING OF DENTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUNCTIONS.

 
Now that we have reviewed individual technologies that can be used in dental practices, we present an integrated view of a prototypical, technologically well-equipped dental office and a review of some of the hardware and software options available. This view illustrates how the technologies can be used together to improve efficiency and work flow in a dental office.


   THE STATE-OF-THE-ART DENTAL OFFICE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 TECHNOLOGY’S FUNCTIONS IN...
 THE STATE-OF-THE-ART DENTAL...
 GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ideally, the well-equipped dental office is designed with IT as a part of the infrastructure, rather than added on as an afterthought. Figure 2Go (pages 36 and 37) reflects this philosophy, showing an office built around an IT design. In Figure 2Go, many IT devices and applications are integrated with existing technology. For example, the foot control for the hand-pieces doubles as a capture pedal for the intraoral camera. Computer hardware is small (for example, a flat screen instead of a cathode ray–tube monitor), and computing devices that do not need to be directly accessible are hidden (for example, central processing units, or CPUs, are located in cabinets).

Figure 2Go takes some artistic liberties with the configuration and layout of a standard dental office. We refrained from depicting many standard office components—such as cabinets, work surfaces and sinks—to be able to focus on technology in the scene. Also, the office is laid out to show the technologies we discuss optimally, not to set an example of good patient flow and work flow design.

The centerpiece of the well-equipped dental office shown in Figure 2Go is the operatory with a variety of computing devices. A monitor for patient viewing is directly integrated into the chair, rather than mounted on the wall or ceiling, as is often the case. Located at an average reading distance from the patient, the monitor provides a much better visual experience for both patient and dentist and does not require a separate pointing device. The monitor can be used to show the patient intraoral images of his or her mouth for diagnosis and treatment purposes; to present before and after images, such as in cosmetic care; and to provide computer-based patient education in topics such as oral hygiene.

The software application that drives the patient monitor is optimized for data entry and navigation without a keyboard. The dentist and the assistant simply use a specialized mouse or trackball, or their voices, to interact with the computer. The CPU for the chair computer is integrated into the base of the dental chair. A second computer—primarily for use by the dentist, hygienist and dental assistant—is installed on a cabinet behind the chair, approximately in the 12 o’clock position. This computer has a keyboard and is used for a variety of data entry and retrieval purposes, such as treatment planning, scheduling, charting and accessing Internet resources.

An intraoral camera is one of the instruments in the delivery system, rather than a separately connected device. As soon as the dentist takes the intraoral camera from the delivery system, the patient monitor switches to a view of the captured image and activates the foot control to freeze or release the image. (Of course, these functions can be configured differently based on user preferences.)

In addition to the intraoral camera, two other types of digital imaging devices are available at chairside. Direct digital radiology sensors26 in different sizes are held by mountings on the chair base. Alternatively, dentists can use storage phosphor plates27 that resemble traditional film. However, those plates must be scanned separately to acquire the images with the computer. A digital camera is available for extraoral photographs.28 Images are transferred to the computer either through a charger base wired to a computer or through the camera’s infrared communications port. In a separate room, a digital panoramic radiographic unit is connected to the practice management system through another computer workstation.

A computer is available in the waiting area so that patients can enter their personal registration data and their complete health and dental histories.

An optional item in the clinical area is a personal digital assistant, or PDA. This device can be used to download selected information from the practice management system and serve as a pocket-sized reference resource on drugs and other clinical topics.29,30

The front desk, as well as the back office (not shown), also are equipped with computer workstations. A device that combines the functions of a laser printer, fax machine, scanner and copier is a space-saving and economical way to provide several disparate functions. The telephone is connected to the computer, so that phone numbers do not have to be dialed manually. The user simply highlights the phone number on the computer and lifts the handset, and the number is automatically dialed. A computer is available in the waiting area so that patients can enter their personal registration data and their complete health and dental histories, as well as review dental health information relevant to them.

The nerve center of the practice is the server room. This locked, climate-controlled and secure room contains the server, which all workstations in the practice use to store and retrieve data. Thus, current data are accessible in real time on all workstations. The server is a computer built for performance, reliability and stability. It should have one or more fast CPUs to perform user tasks without delay. Its disk storage should be a redundant array of inexpensive disks, or RAID. A RAID minimizes the probability of a debilitating disk crash. A built-in tape backup device is used nightly to back up practice data. Backup tapes are stored either in a fireproof safe or off site. Note that a keyboard and monitor are not required in the server room. The server can be administered remotely from a workstation in the back office (or any other workstation in the office, should the user choose to allow this possibility).

A digital subscriber line or cable modem provides a high-speed connection to the Internet.7 A router, connected to the modem, serves two functions. First, it is the hub for all network connections in the office. All computers in the office are wired with standard Ethernet cables and communicate through this hub. Second, it functions as a hardware firewall that protects the equipment and data traffic against attacks by Internet hackers. The server also is connected to a separate dial-up modem that is used for software maintenance and as a backup connection to the Internet in case the primary connection fails.

Another option for networking computers in the office is a wireless network. Encrypted wireless fidelity, or WiFi,31,32 a new wireless networking standard, provides secure connections with a bandwidth of approximately 11 megabits per second (actual throughput depends on the quality of the radio connection). Wireless networks afford much greater flexibility in the placement and number of computer workstations. In addition, they open up possibilities for integrating wireless digital cameras, printers, PDAs and similar devices. However, they have historically had a lower bandwidth than have hard-wired connections.

The falling prices and high performance of today’s computers have made the cost of workstations a secondary consideration. In addition, the incremental price of a license for a multiuser practice management system tends to be much lower than it was even a few years ago. Therefore, dentists should consider where and when information is needed as the primary factor for how many workstations to buy and where to place them. Many times, productivity and efficiency gains exceed the purchase price of an additional workstation by several magnitudes.

Our vision of the well-equipped dental office is not a prescription that can be directly implemented "as is." The decisions on which technologies to purchase, and how to combine them, should be guided by a few general principles.


   GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 TECHNOLOGY’S FUNCTIONS IN...
 THE STATE-OF-THE-ART DENTAL...
 GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Implementing the technologically well-equipped dental office is no small challenge. Rapidly evolving technology, a plethora of different products, the dearth of objective information and evaluations, and limited background knowledge about IT make this a difficult endeavor for many dentists. Focusing on a few guiding principles, however, will increase the likelihood of a successful implementation.

Many times, productivity and efficiency gains exceed the purchase price of an additional workstation by several magnitudes.

A strategic plan. Having a strategic plan is a must for any technology implementation. Regardless of whether an office has already implemented some technology or starts from scratch, a plan provides a blueprint that can guide technology decisions for several years. The planning process should result in

– a statement of expectations;
– a prioritized list of needs and goals for the office;
– an overview of the available technologies that could meet those needs;
a comparative assessment of those technologies;
– a timeline for acquisition of each technology;
– a list of necessary resources, such as money, personnel, renovations and training needed for implementation.

The plan should be reviewed and updated periodically. A good plan is so essential that practitioners may want to consider enlisting professional assistance in its development.

Usability. Suboptimal usability of technology can be a surreptitious and insidious drain on productivity. For instance, even a few extra mouse clicks required to perform a clumsily implemented task on the computer can add up to significant productivity drain and frustration in the long term. User-centered design3336 leads to systems in which the user, not the imaginations of engineers, is the focus of the design process.

Usability can be assessed with a very simple test. Choose a task commonly performed with the product (such as charting a mesial-occlusal-distal restoration on a tooth or taking a single-tooth image with an intraoral camera). Count the number of actions (such as mouse clicks and focus adjustments) needed to complete the task. An excessively large number of actions, especially in comparison with that required by other similar systems, can indicate usability problems.37

Integration. The plethora of technology devices requires a high degree of integration. Typically, many vendors have placed the burden of integration on the user, and that is why examples of poor integration abound. For instance, many intraoral cameras turn on automatically when the handpiece is removed from its holder. Yet, all of them currently require manual activation of the capture mode on the computer, unless the software already is in that state. In a well-integrated system, the complete system should go automatically into capture mode. The consolidation of the dental technology industry offers the hope that such a level of integration indeed will occur in the future.

Work flow support. Integration correlates closely with work flow support. The separate evolution of many different technologies—such as billing and insurance processing, charting and digital imaging—has not encouraged the development of systems focused on the work flow of administration and clinical practice. One of the few systems in dentistry designed "from the ground up" around the work flow of clinical practice is the All-in-One system from Planmeca Oy (Helsinki, Finland).38,39 Systems that optimally support a specific work flow usually are preceded by thorough studies that analyze how clinicians work.40 Optimal systems eliminate duplicative data entry, provide information and functionality where and when it is needed, and distribute tasks effectively among team members.

Cost-benefit analysis. A rigorous cost-benefit analysis should underpin all but the most obvious technology decisions. A commonly made mistake is focusing on purchase price exclusively. For many systems, other costs (such as maintenance and opportunity costs) exceed the purchase price by several magnitudes. Dentists, therefore, should evaluate costs and benefits in detail.

Standards. Systems considered for implementation should conform to existing and evolving standards. For instance, digital imaging devices and programs should comply with the DICOM standard published by the American College of Radiology and the National Electronics Manufacturers’ Association.21 Dentists also should closely monitor the work of the American National Standards Institute–accredited Standards Committee on Dental Informatics41 to stay informed about current and emerging standards.


   CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 TECHNOLOGY’S FUNCTIONS IN...
 THE STATE-OF-THE-ART DENTAL...
 GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
We hope that this vision of a technologically well-equipped dental office will accomplish several things. First, we would like it to be a concise and general guide to the use of computer technology in readers’ practices. While this article hardly scratches the surface of computing in dentistry, the references and resources described will give readers a starting point for further exploration. Second, we wanted to provide a more user-centered, integrated view to the dental technology industry. The high degree of fragmentation of the dental IT industry has not served the profession well. Many of us struggle to make basically incompatible devices work with each other. We expect the industry to focus more attention on the design and evaluation of user- and patient-centered systems.

The type of research that underlies the creation of advanced systems for dental practice, research and education is the domain of an area of study called dental informatics.42 Dental informatics uses research methods from cognitive science, computer science, information science and telecommunications to develop innovative solutions to problems in dental practice. Many problems in dental practice are not trivial and straightforward, and therefore require rigorous research efforts. Without well-founded methodological approaches, computer technology will fall far short of what it could do for patients and for the profession.


   FOOTNOTES
 

Dr. Schleyer is the director, Center for Dental Informatics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, Pa. 15261, e-mail "titus{at}pitt.edu". Address reprint requests to Dr. Schleyer.


Dr. Spallek is an assistant professor, Center for Dental Informatics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh.


Dr. Bartling is a postgraduate fellow, Center for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh.


Dr. Corby is a research associate, Division of Pediatric and Developmental Dental Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh.


The development of this article was supported in part by grant 5 T15 LM/DE07059 from the National Library of Medicine and the National Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Research.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of several people without whom this article would not have been possible. Freelance animator Stephan Hempel ("stephan-hempel{at}web.de") constructed and rendered Figure 2Go. Friedrich (Fred) A. Herbst, i d m, Association of International Dental Manufacturers (Bensheim, Germany), and Joachim Müller, Sirona Dental Systems GmbH (Bensheim, Germany), contributed three-dimensional models for Figure 2Go. Drs. Jean O’Donnell, Marnie Oakley and Mohammed Abasheidi assisted with usability testing of Figure 2Go. A special thank-you goes to Andrea Hyde, who assisted with editing the final manuscript, and to the members of the Erie County (Pa.) Dental Association, who commented on the manuscript.


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 TECHNOLOGY’S FUNCTIONS IN...
 THE STATE-OF-THE-ART DENTAL...
 GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Wilson RF, Coward PY, Capewell J, Laidler TL, Rigby AC, Shaw TJ. Perceived sources of occupational stress in general dental practitioners. Br Dent J 2002;184(10):499–502.

  2. Humphris G. Factors related to time management are major job stressors for GDPs. Br Dent J 2002;184(10):496.

  3. Waddington TJ. New stressors for GDPs in the past 10 years. Br Dent J 2002;182(3):82–3.

  4. Arthur Young and Company. Executive summary: investigation of the application of computer technology to private dental practice. J DC Dent Soc 2002;55(1):19.

  5. Zimmerman JL, Landesman HM, Bilan JP, Ball MJ, Stuffelbeam D, Bydalek RO. Study of computer applications in dental practice. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30(4):731–8.[Medline]

  6. American Dental Association. 2000 Survey of current issues in dentistry: Dentists’ computer use. Chicago: American Dental Association; 2001.

  7. American Dental Association Survey Center. 1995 Survey of current issues in dentistry: Dentists’ computer use. Chicago: American Dental Association; 1996.

  8. American Dental Association Survey Center. 1997 Survey of current issues in dentistry: Dentists’ computer use. Chicago: American Dental Association; 1998.

  9. American Dental Association Survey Center. The 1994 survey of dental practice: Characteristics of dentists in private practice and their patients. Chicago: American Dental Association; 1994.

  10. American Dental Association Survey Center. The 1998 survey of dental practice: Characteristics of dentists in private practice and their patients. Chicago: American Dental Association; 1998.

  11. Schleyer TK, Spallek H, Spallek G. The global village of dentistry: Internet, Intranet, online services for dental professionals. Lombard, Ill.: Quintessence; 1998:21–92.

  12. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information: billing code 4150-04M. Fed Reg 2000;65(250):82461–829 (45 CFR parts 160–164).

  13. Schleyer T, Johnson LA, Pham T. Instructional characteristics of online continuing education courses. Quintessence Int 1999; 30(11): 755–61.[Medline]

  14. OralScan Laboratories. Now see it for yourself. Available at: "www.oralcdx.com/see_yourself.html". Accessed Nov. 19, 2002.

  15. Lussi A, Imwinkelreid S, Longbottom C, Reich E. Performance of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries. Caries Res 2002;1998(34):297.

  16. Schneiderman A, Elbaum M, Schultz T, Keen S, Greenbaum M, Driller J. Assessment of dental caries with digital imaging fiber-optic transillumination (DIFOTI): in vitro study. Caries Res 2002; 1997(31):103–10.

  17. Breen HJ, Rogers PA, Johnson NW. Improvements in methods of periodontal probing: comparison of relative attachment level data selected by outlier reduction protocols from Florida disc probe measurements. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(8):679–87.[Medline]

  18. Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh. CEREC has become modular and fulfills your individual demands. Available at: "www.sirona.de/e/produkte/cerec3/dateien/start_e.html". Accessed Nov. 19, 2002.

  19. Schleyer TK. Clinical decision-making and the Internet. J Am Coll Dent 1999;66(2):29–39.[Medline]

  20. White SC. Decision-support systems in dentistry. J Dent Educ 1996;60(1):47–63.[Abstract]

  21. Dove SB. DICOM and dentistry: an introduction to the standard. Available at: "ddsdx.uthscsa.edu/DICOM.html". Accessed Nov. 19, 2002.

  22. Katz M, Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am Econ Rev 1985;75(3):424–40.

  23. Bartlett M. Sixty percent say privacy fears hinder e-commerce. Available at: "www.info-sec.com/commerce/01/commerce_080801a_j.shtml". Accessed Nov. 19, 2002.

  24. Ruwe S. E-commerce: better safe than sorry. Available at: "news.com.com/2010-1078-281549.html?legacy=cnet". Accessed Nov. 19, 2002.

  25. Lichtenstein S. Developing Internet security policy for organizations. IEEE Comput 1997;4:350–75.

  26. Kademi JA. Direct digital radiography: preliminary review of three FDA-approved systems. J Calif Dent Assoc 1994;22(11):48–56.[Medline]

  27. Brennan J. An introduction to digital radiography in dentistry. J Orthod 2002;29(1):66–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  28. Dunn J, Beckler G. Digital photography technology offers unique capabilities, advantages, and challenges to dental practices. J Calif Dent Assoc 2001;29(10):744–50.[Medline]

  29. Taylor MH. Handheld computing in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46(3):539–51.[Medline]

  30. Gillingham W, Holt A, Gillies J. Hand-held computers in health-care: what software programs are available? N Z Med J 2002; 115(1162):U185.[Medline]

  31. Mihaljevic MJ, Kohno R. On wireless communications privacy and security evaluation of encryption techniques. Available at: "www.csl.sony.co.jp/ATL/papers/MJM_ieeewcnc02.pdf". Accessed Nov. 19, 2002.

  32. Dunne D. The ABCs of wireless communications. Available at: "www.cio.com/communications/edit/120701_abc_wireless.html". Accessed Nov. 19, 2002.

  33. Nielsen J. Designing Web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders; 1999.

  34. Shneiderman B. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer-interaction. 3rd ed. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley Longman; 1998.

  35. Norman DA. The design of everyday things. London: MIT; 1988.

  36. Smailagic S. User-centered interdisciplinary concurrent system design. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Carnegie Mellon University, Institute for Complex Engineered Systems; 2002.

  37. Nielsen J. Applying discount usability engineering. IEEE Software 1995;12(1):98–100.

  38. Wagner IV. Oral health quality enhancement telematics system using an IT&T supported dentist unit. Available at: "www.ehto.org/ht_projects/initial_project_description/orquest.html". Accessed Nov. 19, 2002.

  39. Koch S, Wagner IV, Schneidera W, Hana F. New concept of an integrated IT&T-based dental workstation for quality assurance in oral health care. Medinfo 1998;9(pt)11:107–11.

  40. Yakel E, Cote S, Finholt T, Cohen M. Medicine in the dark: obtaining design requirements for a medical collaboratory from observation of radiologists at work. In: Ackerman MS, ed. CSCW ’96: Proceedings of the ACM 1996 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Nov. 16–20, 1996, Boston, Mass. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 1996.

  41. American Dental Association, Standards Committee on Dental Informatics. Information on the Standards Committee for Dental Informatics. Available at: "www.ada.org/scdi/aca-scdi/dispatch.cgi/public". Accessed Nov. 19, 2002.

  42. Schleyer T, Spallek H. Dental informatics: a cornerstone of dental practice. JADA 2001;132(5):605–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
P. Q. Shelley, B. R. Johnson, and E. A. BeGole
Use of an Electronic Patient Record System to Evaluate Restorative Treatment Following Root Canal Therapy
J Dent Educ., October 1, 2007; 71(10): 1333 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
H. SPALLEK
A resource guide for practice development through technology
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2004; 135(suppl_1): 38S - 44S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
E. A. Mendonca
Clinical Decision Support Systems: Perspectives in Dentistry
J Dent Educ., June 1, 2004; 68(6): 589 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ADRHome page
M. Kirshner
The Role of Information Technology and Informatics Research in the Dentist-Patient Relationship
Advances in Dental Research, December 1, 2003; 17(1): 77 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ADRHome page
H.L. Bailit
Health Services Research
Advances in Dental Research, December 1, 2003; 17(1): 82 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHLEYER, T. K.L.
Right arrow Articles by CORBY, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SCHLEYER, T. K.L.
Right arrow Articles by CORBY, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Practice Management


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS